Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


Video cards and lag Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM
New Member

New MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5/10/2005 8:38 PM
Posts: 19, Visits: 2
Hey everyone, I have a new graphics card, everything new installed (drivers, directx 9b, etc) and it seems like my graphics kind of lag...like I loaded a new screen saver from Microsoft Plus! (the fish tank one) and it seems like it...just lags...anyone have any suggestions to help everything run smoothly?
  Post #839
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM
Associate Member

Associate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate MemberAssociate Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 8/27/2006 12:10 PM
Posts: 334, Visits: 13
Perhaps you could tone down you system settings and display properties.
  Post #27629
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/12/2006 3:38 PM
Posts: 169, Visits: 20
try changing your display from 32 bit to 16 bit...this should solve you problem, and it is putting 1/2 less stress on your vid card then is necessary.



I just recently made the switch from 32 bit to 16 bit...and there is hardly a difference in icons and wallpapers...a very live-withable difference.



All the forces of evil needs to succeed is for enough good men to do nothing.

-Edmund Burke
  Post #27630
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Senior Advisor

Senior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior Advisor

Group: Senior Advisor
Last Login: 6/23/2008 10:37 AM
Posts: 1,371, Visits: 681
What card did you buy?



  Post #27631
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Forum Advisor

Forum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum Advisor

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 1/1/2004 11:06 AM
Posts: 992, Visits: 1

I agree with chaf3d on one point: 16 bit vs. 32 bit is difficult to differentiate between; however, the remark about it working 1/2 as much is not quite correct. 16 bit and 32 bit are 'exponential differences' not geometric or algebraic differences!


As for the source problem, the card, CPU and RAM set-up would be nice to know here!



  Post #27632
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM
New Member

New MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5/10/2005 8:38 PM
Posts: 19, Visits: 2

Kind of weird, heh...


 


GeForce FX 5200 Ultra 128MB


768MB RDRAM


1.8GHz Pent 4

  Post #27633
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Senior Forum Advisor

Senior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum AdvisorSenior Forum Advisor

Group: Senior Advisor
Last Login: 7/14/2006 12:11 PM
Posts: 1,550, Visits: 191
I usually recommend 24 bits on newer systems if available.  That's the same color depth as 32 bits, actually.  The added 8 bits are just for alpha blending.

~The Cracketeer~


Full computer specs
  Post #27634
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Senior Advisor

Senior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior AdvisorSenior Advisor

Group: Senior Advisor
Last Login: 6/23/2008 10:37 AM
Posts: 1,371, Visits: 681
[QUOTE=canadadude]

As for the source problem, the card, CPU and RAM set-up would be nice to know here!

[/QUOTE]



That's what I'm curious about. In the old days of 98 and such setting your colors to 16bit was a tweak because graphic cards and pc's were low end compared to now, but with the speed of cpus and the amount of RAM graphics cards and pcs have it's a moot point now.



  Post #27635
 
Posted 7/31/2003 1:07 AM


Forum Advisor

Forum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum AdvisorForum Advisor

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 1/1/2004 11:06 AM
Posts: 992, Visits: 1
Completely agree, Mno, but I had no clue whether Nedlar was running a 'legacy system' or not!

  Post #27636
 
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »



All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 5:14am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2012
Execution: 0.181. 8 queries. Compression Disabled.